Epsilon Logo
    • Digital
    • Retail Media
    • Loyalty
    • Website
    • Blog
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • About Us
    • Our culture
    • Careers
    • Pressroom
    • Partners
    • Products & Services

      • Digital
      • Retail Media
      • Loyalty
      • Accelerate
    • Insights

      • Blog
      • Case Studies
      • Pressroom
    • About Us

      • Our Culture
      • Our Locations
      • Our Partners
      • Youniverse
    Cookie Policy 
    Privacy Policy 
    Terms & Conditions 
    Privacy Settings 
    ©2026 Epsilon Data Management, LLC. All rights reserved. All names and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
    1. Homepage
    2. Resources
    3. Blog
    4. HOW BRANDS CAN STEER CLEAR OF UNSAFE SITES
    Blog

    HOW BRANDS CAN STEER CLEAR OF UNSAFE SITES

    By: Epsilon Marketing•August 31, 2016

    To achieve the highest level of ad quality, marketers have to crush all the obstacles in their way. As we’ve discussed already, the first step is to ensure viewability—and then making sure that those views are from real humans.

    Once that’s done, marketers will start racking up real, validated impressions. But unless they’re on brand-safe, relevant sites, they may be doing more harm than good. This brings us to the third piece of the ad quality puzzle: brand safety.

    When marketers hear “brand safety,” they may think about avoiding adult content. And that’s definitely part of it. But lots of content can negatively impact a brand, with different brands having different thresholds of what’s acceptable.

    Consider the upcoming US presidential election. The candidates’ combined digital budget is expected to be nearly $1 billion, more than six times that of 2012’s race. But in the wilds of programmatic advertising, dangerous juxtapositions can occur—like ads from gun-safety advocates appearing on pro-gun sites, and pre-roll ads running before ISIS videos. These are not only harmful at impression time, but with a well-timed screen shot, they could be a PR disaster.

    Programmatic platforms may be targeting the right consumer demographics, and even the right consumers. But if they’re not taking placement into account, they’re not doing enough to protect brands. Which is probably why, according to an Undertone study, brand safety is the number one concern of buyers of programmatic inventory.

    As with the other ad quality issues, brand safety can be achieved with the right tools and knowledge. For instance, Conversant has direct relationships with publishers, and works with them to confirm the brand-safety needs of their advertisers. And we use proprietary classification tools that combine computer vision and text-based analysis to understand web content on a deep level. That way, we can identify brand-unsafe content and build an index of web pages to block at impression time.

    With access to direct publisher relationships and a deep understanding of content that drills down to the page level, marketers can be sure that their ads will appear next to not only safe content, but the best content.

    Learn more about ensuring brand safety, as well as the other issues impeding ad quality, when you download our ad quality guide.

    Get insights straight to your inbox.

    Sign up for the Epsilon Insider newsletter and receive the latest marketing trends and insights from the industry's top experts.
    Select Country

    Privacy Policy update your Preferences.

    Insights

    Related Posts

    Blog
    DEMAND EVEN MORE THAN 100% VIEWABILITY
    Learn more
    Blog
    AD FRAUD DRIVES MORE CLICK FICTION
    Learn more
    Explore more insights